Fixing Our Broken Transit Planning Process

You are here

Fixing Our Broken Transit Planning Process

Abstract: 

While there is more funding than ever available for mass transit projects, it never seems to be sufficient as project costs continue to increase independent of inflation. If the U.S. wants to use that money more effectively going forward, it is critical to consider as many ways as possible to reduce costs. One potential place for savings is in the planning process. Transit typically sells a project politically before it is planned, combines the planning and environmental processes into one, and organizes planning, construction, and operations functions into walled siloes. Transit should consider modifying its planning processes in a few specific ways to potentially reduce time and cost and improve mobility.

Authors: 

JOSHUA SCHANK, PHD

Joshua Schank holds a PhD in Urban Planning from Columbia University and a Master of City Planning from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a Research Associate at the Mineta Transportation Institute, a Managing Principal at InfraStrategies, and a Senior Fellow in the Institute for Transportation Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles.

EMMA HUANG

Emma Huang is a Senior Consultant with InfraStrategies LLC. Emma previously worked as a Manager in the Office of Extraordinary Innovation at LA Metro, where she focused on transit research and policy. She holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Published: 
August 2023
Keywords: 
Transportation planning
Project delivery
Strategic planning
Organizational factors
Capital costs

-

CSUTC
MCEEST
MCTM
NTFC
NTSC

Contact Us

SJSU Research Foundation   210 N. 4th Street, 4th Floor, San Jose, CA 95112    Phone: 408-924-7560   Email: mineta-institute@sjsu.edu