Alternative Project Delivery Methods in California Transportation Agencies: The Path Forward

Alternative Project Delivery Methods (PDMs) establish how owners, designers, and contractors are contractually organized and how design and construction phases are sequenced. Multiple research has been conducted on the selection, use, and effectiveness of PDM in the US and worldwide. However, there is limited research that focuses just on California’s use of alternative PDMs in transportation projects, its associated pros and cons, legislations/authorizations, and project performance.

Thus, the goal of this project is twofold. First, to benchmark the existing use of PDMs in local transportation agencies of different types and sizes in California,  considering the characteristics of each alternative PDM and the authorizations enabling its implementation. Second, to provide recommendations to policy and decision-makers for key factors to consider in alternative PDM selection and implementation by California’s local transportation agencies. 

To this end, the research team will conduct a literature review of existing literature and enabling legislation & authorizations, content analysis of the previous information, a survey of transportation agencies in California, and case studies.

The project findings will support the California State Transportation Committee (CSTC), and the State Legislature's decisions by providing a state-of-the-art of the alternative PDMs used in California coupled with the pros and cons of each method, agencies that are utilizing them, and projects' performance.

Principal Investigator: 
Ghada Gad, PhD
PI Contact Information: 

gmgad@cpp.edu

Cal Poly Pomona

Dates: 
June 2024 to May 2025
Implementation of Research Outcomes: 

The results of this project will provide a

  • synthesis of enabling legislation and policies to implement alternative PDMs for local transportation agencies in California,
  • a benchmark of alternative PDBs currently used,
  • an identification of advantages and disadvantages, and
  • recommendations for key aspects to consider.
Impacts/Benefits of Implementation: 

Although there is considerable research nationally on the use of alternative PDMs, there is an urgent need for a study that focuses on their use in local transportation agencies in California. The project findings will benefit the state by providing an assessment of state-of-the-art alternative PDM use in California coupled with the pros and cons of each method, agencies that are utilizing them, and projects’ performance. Broadly speaking, alternative PDMs aim at providing a more effective delivery of the design and construction stages, minimizing cost overruns and delays. Improvements in how to manage the different PDMs available at the different decision-making levels will lead to faster project completion, cost savings, and enhanced safety. Overall, a more informed use of PDMs in transportation projects will lead to a more effective use of Californians' taxpayers' money.

Project Number: 
2455

-

CSUTC
MCEEST
MCTM
NTFC
NTSC

Contact Us

SJSU Research Foundation   210 N. 4th Street, 4th Floor, San Jose, CA 95112    Phone: 408-924-7560   Email: mineta-institute@sjsu.edu