Research Project Description

Mineta Transportation Institute

Barriers to Using Fixed-Route Transit for Older Adults

Project Number: 2402


Principal Investigator:

Michael D. Peck, Ph.D., MA, MSW, Mineta RA, Assistant Professor, College of Social Work and Director, Social Work Aging Resource Center, San José State University

Institution:
Mineta Transportation Institute

Telephone Number:
(408) 924-7560mti@mti.sjsu.edu

Project Objective:
This research is intended to enhance public transit utilization for older adults by identifying perceived and actual barriers and presenting public transit policy and design solutions to meet the needs of older adults, including those that will promote safe, comfortable and efficient public transit.

Abstract:

The specific aims of this proposed research are to assess older adults’ perceptions of (1) safety on public transit, (2) safety traveling from home to public transit stops and stations, (3) the ease of using public transit facilities and vehicles, (4) the ease of traveling from home to public transit stops and stations, and (5) the availability and accessibility of public transit information. The research will also assess (6) the factors that inform older adults’ decision to use public transit.

 

The researchers pose two hypotheses: (1) personal and demographic characteristics (e.g. economic status, physical characteristics, and cognitive abilities) and public transit service characteristics negatively affect older adults’ perceptions about riding public transit, and (2) discrepancies between perceived barriers and actual situations negatively affect older adults’ beliefs about their ability to use public transit. In both of these hypotheses public transit interventions exist that will improve older adults’ perception of public transit, increase transit ridership, promote autonomy and independence, and improve older adults’ well-being. Little is known about the factors that inform these older adults’ appraisals of public transit, making this research both innovative and timely.

 

Appraisal is a mental process of evaluating aspects of one’s life. During appraisal people access mental data that include beliefs and feelings about self, aging, society, and even public transit. By learning more about these mental processes in older adults, including discrepancies between perceived barriers and actual situations, we can learn about the interventions what will facilitate older adults’ successful use of public transit systems.

 

The findings will inform a diversity of stakeholders, including consumer and advocacy groups, public transportation agencies and private carriers, government agencies, service providers, university researchers, older persons, and disabled persons. The findings will include both targeted short-term solutions and long-term recommendations for making public transit more convenient and more accessible to older persons.

 

Description and Project dates:

 

Task One:

Literature review: Identify the types of studies that have been undertaken to learn about the travel needs of older persons, the approaches and research methods that have been used to collect and analyze data about older persons, and the gaps in the research and knowledge base about older persons’ perception of using public transit. May 2005-June 2005

Task Two:
Conduct Focus Groups
: Four target groups (2 each location, San Jose/Santa Clara County, CA and Buffalo/Erie County, NY).  June 2005-August 2005

Task Three:
Develop and Pre-Test Questionnaire: Discussed above. Task will include questionnaire development, additional focus group to test, and analysis by experts.  August 2005-September 2005

Task Four:
Sample Selection and Administer Survey
: Identify paratransit riders and seniors with help from the two transit systems and senior agencies in the target counties. Mail the initial card, survey, and final card.  September 2005-November 2005

Task Five:

Analysis of Survey Results: Input and data cleaning will begin as surveys are received. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses to be conducted. November 2005-December 2005

 

Task Six:

Project Documentation: Write the abstract, introduction, literature review results, observations and analysis, results and conclusions. Submit draft final report to MTI.  January 2006-May 2006

 

Task Seven:

Dissemination of Findings: The research will produce a processed survey data set (stripped of identifiers) that will be made available to future studies, standards, and design efforts. The team plans at least two articles suitable for publication in refereed journals. The team plans at least two conference presentations in national settings, including at TRB. Continuous

 


Following submission of the draft final report, the following actions will occur:
Copyedit and preparation of Peer Review Draft
Peer Review and Author’s Response
Final Editing and Pre-Publication
Printer’s Blue line Proof and Final Print
The estimated time for these to occur will be no less than two months. Final publication and Web posting: July 2006

Total Budget: $53,357

Principal Investigator:

Michael D. Peck, Ph.D., MA, MSW, Mineta RA, Assistant Professor, College of Social Work and Director, Social Work Aging Resource Center, San José State University

 

Team Members:

Member:

Daniel Hess, Ph.D., Mineta RA, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, University of   Buffalo, State University of New York

 

Students:

SJSU: Swathi Boreda, Monica Rowden 

U Buffalo: Kelly Dixon, Mark McGovern 

 

Technology Transfer Activities:
Upon publication, pdf and html versions will be available on the Mineta Transportation Institute web site. The project experience and data will be available for community meetings. Authors are encouraged to submit articles based on the research to relevant journals and to present the information to end-users at conferences,

 

Potential Benefits of the Project:

This research will serve as a baseline for future research. Profiles of older adults who ride or do not ride public transit will be created. The research will create a framework for understanding perceptions of public transit that will then be used to identify interventions. When implemented, these interventions can be evaluated for effectiveness in increasing the efficiency of public transit for older persons. Interventions could include schedule changes that meet older adults’ activity needs. This is particularly important in suburbs where transit is usually designed to serve working commuters. Aging suburbanites have different needs.

 

.

 Key Words: Senior citizens, Public transit, Transit, Transit riders, Mobility